Ipswich: 01473 214481
Norwich: 01603 617351
Chelmsford: 01245 215660
Contact us

Graham Sinclair

Graham, as Head of EA Law - East Anglian Chambers since March 2011, divides his time between running a busy set and working for his clients. Graham deals mainly with real property (including land registration, commercial and residential landlord and tenant, nuisance and other property-related torts, boundaries and easements, trusts of land and constructive or resulting trusts). As well as his property-related work Graham also specialises in contested probate and family provision, mental capacity, contract (including employment covenants and confidentiality), partnership, professional negligence, personal insolvency, local government and judicial review.
Graham Sinclair Graham Sinclair
Graham is most likely to appear in the Chancery Division, before the Land Registration section of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) or the County Court, with occasional visits to the Administrative Court and the Court of Appeal. However, he considers that the less formal but more constructive setting of the mediation suite usually has greater advantages for the client.
He lectures and writes articles regularly on property and litigation-related subjects. Mentioned for his "significant property practice" in Legal 500, its 2011 edition described him as the "all-round package: good on his feet, quick on the uptake and good with the commercial clients", and in 2015 that "He manages to explain the law to clients in a manner they understand".

Graham is a member of the Chancery Bar Association and also sits as a fee-paid judge of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).

  • Boundary and public and private right of way disputes, including successful claims concerning rights over registered common land; also mooring and navigation easements.
  • Party Wall Act claims.
  • Claims against trustees of land for losses suffered by estate beneficiaries arising from their wilful refusal to join in a sale of the trust property.
  • Disputes between co-owners under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996.
  • Advising a German company on the wording of a break clause in a lease of commercial property in London, the trigger being a referendum vote against the UK remaining in the EU.
  • Advising on succession rights under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986.
  • Breach of covenant claims against former employees setting up in competition.
  • Judicial review proceedings concerning the award of a Legal Services Commission contract and the decision of an NHS Primary Care Trust to shut a hospital ward without proper consultation.
  • Housing homelessness appeals under Part VII of the Housing Act 1996.
  • Terminal leasehold dilapidation claims in respect of light industrial and commercial units.
  • Misrepresentation claims arising on sales of land.
  • Successfully defending a claim by an estranged daughter against her sister and sole beneficiary of their mother’s estate under the Inheritance (Provision for Family & Dependants) Act 1975.
  • Successfully defending a substantial claim by a mother against her son, alleging undue influence in his handling of her investments and denying that transfers were by way of gift.
  • Advising a highways authority about the Advance Payments Code for street works under Part XI of the Highways Act 1980.

Reported Cases
Line v Baker & anor [2014] EWHC 1368 (Ch); [2014] 2 P&CR DG14 – Whether following sale of hotel owned by deceased's estate the transfer by executors of shares in business operating from it at no additional consideration was proper, and whether estate beneficiaries could trace into new property purchased by business.  Whether evidence was concealed so as to trigger Limitation Act 1980, s.32.

Re Home & Office Fire Extinguishers Ltd [2012] EWHC 917 (Ch) – Determination of issues arising where the two shareholders and directors in a company each sought an order for the compulsory purchase of the other's shareholding; including whether the conduct of one or the other was unfairly prejudicial under the Companies Act 2006, s.994.
R (oao Allan Rutherford Ltd Solicitors) v Legal Services Commission [2010] EWHC 3068 (Admin) - Judicial review of award of LSC contract following tendering exercise.
Hale v Norfolk County Council [2001] Ch 717 (CA) – Dedication of land as highway under New Streets Orders, and the proper application of the "hedge to hedge" presumption.

Marlton v Turner [1998] 3 EGLR 185 – Hedgerows and fencing obligations arising from private Inclosure Awards.

Clarke v Smith [1995] EGCS 122 (CA) – Building case about term to be implied in contract concerning sufficiency of foundations.

Little v Courage Ltd [1995] 69 P&CR 447 (Ch D) – Test case on whether brewer landlord could frustrate option to renew 5 year lease by refusing to enter into linked business agreement.

First introduced to the subject of ADR and trained as a mediator (as long ago as 1995), Graham came to realise that litigation over points of “principle” is often the result of parties’ failure to make a dispassionate assessment not only of the legal merits but also their genuine interests, and of a reluctance to appreciate that the use of objectively justifiable criteria can assist negotiation.
Graham practises as a general or commercial mediator.  He is a director of Mediators in East Anglia (a company limited by guarantee) and is a subscribing member of the Civil Mediation Council, a CMC Registered mediator and also appears on the Bar Council list of Barrister Mediators.
In his role as a mediator Graham has applied skills learnt - as a barrister and tribunal chairman and also from his previous mediations - to help resolve disputes covering a wide range of subject areas, including landlord & tenant, building disputes, partnership, breach of contract (from equipment leasing to an introduction agency), rights of way, interests in land, boundary disputes, wills and family provision, and professional negligence.

"I would like to take this opportunity to express my gratitude for all your help and support yesterday. My mum went through a lot, but your presence and involvement helped immensely."

"Thank you for stepping in at short notice. Not only have you grasped the issues very quickly, you have managed to wade through the trivia and get to the very nub of the matter."

"As a property developer, I frequently come across landlocked sites in London with awkward right-of-way issues.  Graham was able to study the adjacent title plans and land registry history, and propose a plan of action which led to the right of way for the development site being affirmed and expanded through rectification with the Land Registry, thus allowing the project to proceed.  He is practical and commercially minded and worked well with my planning consultants and solicitor."

Graham is a pleasure to work with - thoughtful, thorough, coherent, logical and courteous but, perhaps for me the most helpful, prepared to pick up the phone and offer unsolicited support when appropriate.
Contact us